Who is Randi Lee Harper (@Randileeharper)?
I believe Randi’s charity, which she along with Alex Lifschitz (Crash Overrride Network, @), Zoe Quinn (Crash Override Network, @), and Sheri Rubin (Design Direct Deliver, @) who serve as inaugural members for the organization’s board of directors is a sham designed to profit off the media attention surrounding Gamer Gate.
I believe @jack and @vijaya and @safety public statements are duplicitous and harm consumers who then believe Twitter indeed seeks to protect safety and privacy.
How do I know that she does not actually fight or prevent abuse?
Because of the abuse she openly and routinely engages in massive amounts of abuse.
And the fact that when I asked her for help she attacked me with false allegations.
Randi is allowed to lie at will, spread falsehoods, and label anyone she wishes as part of a Hate group for simply using Twitter as designed. To communicate.
I don’t refer to any of these alleged groups as groups except ISIS.
I also appear to have offended ISIS, being on their public block list. Thanks Twitter. It’s great to know ISIS has a published blocklist that’s publically available on Twitter.
That’s @jack looking out for my @safety!
I believe #RandileeHarperGate is a Hate group.
I have no idea why journalists like @kristenvbrown simply regurgitate her tripe that she spews out, and thinks that not being able to control free speech, in a country that guarantees free speech is a problem.
It seems @randileeharper, who asks for feedback then blocks people that make it, cannot take commentary that speaks about her massive, entitled, empowered abuse she pours out routinely onto PoC like Arthur Chu, Derek Smart and Mercedes Carrera.
What Randi Lee Harper considers abuse or harassment is subjective, according to her own words.
So people are held to account of a tyrant, that by a whim can say you are harassing her and journalists jump.
Meanwhile white journalists like Kristen pump out shlock quickly, without obtaining comment or do any significant fact checking.
How do I know this?
Because I submitted approximately 100 links of live tweets to Kristen. And still await her meaningful response.
Despite being able to go to press quickly to write about Randi, she hasn’t been able to review what I forwarded.
This is some of the most hateful conduct I can imagine short of actual credible threats of violence to another that results in criminal prosecution.
How can twitter claim to have reviewed the account at all?
I cannot claim to have reviewed her whole timeline, just what I can find in archives.
Review of her account continues.
Allan Brauer, a former leader in the CA Democratic party resigned after tweeting to Conservative commentator Amanda Carpenter that he wished her children would die long and unpleasant deaths.
And remained unmoderated by Twitter. Despite losing his position in the Democratic party.
So, as part of my own investigation, I reported that tweet to Twitter.
And was told that it did NOT violate Twitter’s Terms of Service.
I proceeded to tell Twitter @support in yet another report that I would be archiving and writing about this.
Only then was Allan subjected to moderation and the tweet removed from Twitter.
I asked Randi her for help, and she denied knowing @jack, despite having met with the @safety team in 2015.
And she made false allegations against me. Somehow she thought she could determine my intent without asking what it was.
I knew Randi had met with @safety because she had tweeted this information after Journalist @Karaswisher forwarded her medium article to @jack, and @jack responded to Randi.
I thought, and hoped Randi would agree to help me. She did not.
Randi believes that she does not have to read the content of a tweet to determine if it is hateful.
Simply tweeting to a hashtag she doesn’t approve of leads to you being placed on a massive, propagating blocklist which can lead to your account suspension.
This also continues the same pattern that I have seen before, where threats and intimidation are not moderated by @twitter.
Here she attempts to bully a PoC not just off @twitter, but off the internet for disagreeing with her.
According to connected Randi Lee Harper abuse is subjective,
This was NOT a problem for @randileeharper until she determined it impacted HER personal safety.
However, how many other peoples safety is she affecting by potentially blocking credible threats from other people through her massively propagating blockbots?
Additionally, 44% of consumers online are gamers. Over 1.2 billion people worldwide. According to Pew Research 49% of American adults play games.
@Jack literally allows these few people, to habitually attack and label as a hate group the massive amount of gamers who only want to use Twitter for what it is for, and instead find themselves labeled as part of a hate group by these few people.
@Randileeharper is able to control free speech through the use of outright bullying, threats, intimidation and mass blocking of accounts, simply for tweeting to a hashtag.
Even as she believes her metadata analysis determines who is a member of a Hate Group, without reading the content?
Can anyone question that @jack has any actual commitment to @safety, #privacy and truth? Freedom of Speech? No. Not when @randileeharper can function as a tyrant.
And it can only be their intent.
She is privileged, by @jack.
If you want to help support a victim of abuse, support @jacieleopold, not someone like @spacekatgal who labels 1.2 billion people worldwide, 44% of consumers online, as trolls and psychopaths because they like to play games, and tweet to a hashtag, #gamergate, that Twitter allows.
Or barring that, write to Senator Feinstein and tell her that CDA 96 230 which gives Twitter immunity enables this massive abuse of consumers.
If you find yourself unfairly suspended by @twitter after being targeted by @randileeharper, the San Francisco DA’s office offers consumers mediation through their Consumes Protection Unit.
I still have my knees thanks to the combined efforts of Senator Feinstein, the CA DoJ and SF DA’s office.
Strangely enough Allan Brauer, Democratic supporter of @hillaryclinton is opposed to consumers protections.
Haters like these stick together folks, and it’s who you know at @twitter, not any commitment to safety, privacy or free speech that determines who gets suspended or simply left to be abused by enabled cyberbullies.