@Jack think that $TWTR is for empowered dialogue, blah, blah, blah.
I think @Jack is misleading and does not care how his Terms of Service is structured to punish communication and is easily abused by his personally empowered abuser, @Randileeharper.
So let’s start by examining what talking to a delusional fundamentalist is like.
Damien is a person who likes to think he knows how social media functions.
Having a conversation with a journalist who assumes he is wholly correct is tedious, difficult and ultimately pointless as they are rigidly bound to their ideology and unable to process new and valid information.
So how does Randi Lee Harper abuse @twitter consumers beyond being openly threatening?
First, along with Anita Sarkeesian @femfreq, Brianna Wu @spacekatgal and Zoe Quinn @unburntwitch, label anyone who doesn’t agree with you as part of a hate group.
This includes 44% of consumers worldwide, who by disagreeing with these 4 in some way, winded up labeled as a hate group equivalent to ISIS.
And yet she knows she is falsely labeling a very large preponderance of people that tweet to #gamergate as a hate group.
Set out to build an army.
Twitter took sides with a tiny amount of people that labeled people tweeting to a hashtag as a Hate Group.
@Nero, AKA Milo Yiannopoulos is a professional journalist last seen in a White House press briefing asking questions.
And controls them with fear and intimidation, leaving them socially isolated on @twitter.
As Randi Lee Harper, meta data expert knows, SJW Twitter is the worst, and she exploits it’s behavior to abuse.
So how can Randi Lee Harper silence you?
Besides meeting with @safety, that is.
Randi likes to claim that tweeting her valid questions is inciting dog piling.
This despite no intent to dogpile. I was simply following up with the person, Cathy Young, that @randileeharper claimed was sending followers to dogpile her.
“Incitement” is against ToS. Yet @twitter will suspend you without even determining your intent, or the validity of the speech itself.
Interestingly twitter claims to prohibit false or misleading tweets, but those tweets by @randileeharper seem to not be moderated.
Also mentioned is adding large number of unrelated users to lists. Randi categorizes 44% of consumers, gamers as members of a Hate group, and propagates that block list to subscribers.
The only way they are remotely related is playing games, but Randi adds large numbers to lists and blocks them.
And then you can end up suspended for being blocked by a large number of people.
So this little ball of hate is empowered by @jack to limit free speech and consumers ability to utilize Twitter as they see fit, without actual threats to any other consumers.
It’s the craziest business decision I have seen in a long time.
Letting 44% of consumers be labeled as a Hate Group?
And Twitter wonders what is wrong.
Turn IT UP!
Special thanks to @Klout.