Tag Archives: cybersecurity

The Troubling Rise of Anti Semitism on $TWTR and in American #Politics

Faced with the troubling rise of anti semitism in Europe it now appears the hate has made the jump across the ocean with the help of @jack and Twitter.

Kristen V. Brown of Fusion reports that,

Twitter has failed at controlling horrifying anti-Semitism

The constant flow of troubling anti semitical attacks on Jewish reporters is troubling, as is the rise of actually hateful propaganda and imagery intended to instill fear in what is a tiny minority of people.

However, I also find that far from failing to control the hateful rhetoric, they actively perpetuate it given Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey’s active embracing of #blacklivesmatter.

One has to wonder if Jack Dorsey is himself not a closeted anti semite.

Jonathan Greenberg wrote in the Washington Post that,

“In its new platform, Black Lives Matter (BLM) has, despite the total lack of relevance to its own agenda or interests, thrown whatever heft it has behind the anti-Semitic movement to Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS) Israel. In doing so, it is inarguably contributing to the campaign to “other” the world’s only Jewish state and, with it, the Jews themselves.”

Given CIA’s testimony that Twitter is NOT helping as much as they could with the rise of ISIS, and the transmission of open threats, including attempting to hire a hitman on twitter by one Islamic user of twitter, I can only surmise that Jack pretty much despises the United States and his customers.

 

And while few brave voices like Louise Mensch of Heat Street and Kristen V Brown speak out about the troubling rise of anti semitism, many other prominent or smaller, but newly influential voices on the right who proclaim to be Zionists openly embrace anti semite networks to further their own right wing politics goals.

It’s sad to know that the Center of American politics is shrinking.

Don’t fall for the current rhetoric.  The Constitution is a centrist document that allows all voices.

We allow the voices so we can hear the threat, and react.  As well as have vigorous debate in the public square.

Silencing public voices merely drives the threat underground, where it can bubble up far stronger than ever thought.

They are bubbling up now.   Thanks, Jack.

 

 

Related Content:

Why Does @Jack and Twitter Play Favorites in Targeted Abuse Cases? #custserv #cybersecurity $TWTR

It’s beyond a given that Jack and Twitter allow abuse of a huge portion of their own customer base.

Journalists Kristen V Brown and Kassy Dillon have routinely received death threats with inaction by @support.

The only question now is why.

The answer seems to be politics, as even Jack shyly demured when an interviewer noted that his politics were pretty clear.  (21:04).

 

Model Kate Upton came under massive attack after being targeted by Roland Martin for daring to express her opinion bout Colin Kaepernick’s flag protest.

 

I do not believe Ms. Upton joined twitter to be condescended to or ordered about by Mr. Martin.

 

And yet @jack has not DM’d Kate Upton to render assistance as she is on her third day of targeted abuse by black lives matters advocates.

This after leaping to the defense of actress Leslie Jones after she tweeted racist and colorist tweets for years.

 

The misogyny and hatred is in tremendous volume with no sign of slowing down.

Everybody knows how it works, anticipates it.

 

 

 

These are but a small sampling of the abuse heaped on some, with inaction by @jack and @support.

That abuse heaped on Kate Upton directly contradict what Twitter General Council Vijaya Gadde wrote in her Washington Post Op Ed of 4/16/2015.

I’m often inspired by the vigorous debates on controversial issues that occur on Twitter, but I’ve also been seriously troubled by the plight of some of our users who are completely overwhelmed by those who are trying to silence healthy discourse in the name of free expression. At times, this takes the form of hateful speech in tweets directed at women or minority groups; at others, it takes the form of threats aimed to intimidate those who take a stand on issues. These users often hide behind the veil of anonymity on Twitter and create multiple accounts expressly for the purpose of intimidating and silencing people. We have seen this type of behavior time and time again, including during GamerGate and other incidents involving both public figures and other individuals, so we are changing our approach to this problem, in some ways that won’t be readily apparent and in others that will be.

 

It’s clear Twitter does not enforce their terms of service and safety policy in a coherent, unbiased manner.

 

$TWTR @Safety Consultant @Randileeharper Propagates ISIS, @Jack is “Consciously Failing” To Fight Terror

The United Kingdom Home Affairs Committee published a report arguing that social media giants like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube are “consciously failing” to combat the use of their sites to promote terrorism and killings,

In Twitter’s case this is undoubtedly true as Randi Lee Harper, allegedly an internet abuse expert, propagated ISIS on twitter.

Ms Harper has contacts with Twitter Safety (thought to be @Delbius) and openly boasts of being able to make queries of twitter and has openly violated consumers privacy in the past.

 

In a shocking display, Ms. Harper tweeted (tweets still live) an information dump of ISIS propaganda.

 

@Jack has tweeted with @Randileeharper, indicating that he takes her advice on “safety” seriously.

 

Jack responded to Randi Lee Harper after journalist Kara Swisher (running for San Francisco Mayor) tweeted Randi Lee Harper’s Medium article to @Jack for review.

Vocative has reported that ISIS has been growing at least as fast as Twitter has been suspending accounts, no doubt in large part to Randi Lee Harper’s propagating ISIS materials and Jack’s conscious disregard of safety for all of Twitter’s customers.

In fact, Twitter’s customers actually fight ISIS on twitter, with @Jack and @support frequently suspending accounts actively trying to aid the US & UK in the fight against terrorism.

I often wonder why it is that @Jack has such callous disregard for the safety of his consumers, even as Islamists openly declare Presidential candidate Donald Trump their enemy and solicit hitmen.

 

As for Randi Lee Harper, her motivation is clear.  To “burn down” Twitter.

And she has, however @Jack seems complicit in the burning of national security and twitter investors.

Not to mention consumers whose safety is compromised by alleged expert Randi Lee Harper.

 

Related Content:

http://www.vocativ.com/309792/isis-rallies-army-of-trolls-to-attack-twitter-and-facebook/

http://www.vocativ.com/279630/dark-net-2/

 

 

Why Does @Jack @Vijaya Allow Targeted Abuse Mobs To Flourish on $TWTR? #socialmedia #custserv

One thing that should be clear is that @jack does not have a commitment to his customers safety, privacy or ability to communicate freely on twitter.

Brianna Wu, (@spacekatgal) runs a 50,000 strong targeted abuse mob that she knowingly uses to attack twitter consumers.

 

Imagine the temerity of these people.  Discussing whether Eddie Izzard, a celebrity and public person, should be barred from commenting on transgender issues.

Clearly these people do not respect freespeech, commentary, satire and news, yet @jack allows them to habitually attack his consumers.

The #beyhive of @beyonce functions in much the same way.   Launching attacks  coordinated off their own forums and attacking Twitter consumers in droves.

Simply google “beyhive” to see.  The news media is very kind and documents their actions.

Capture

 

The Ringer documented the Beyhive in an article entitled, “Inside The Beyhive” on June 3, 2016.

Capture

 

However @jack allows the beyhive to function as well.

What SEEMS to bother Jack is not that abuse on twitter exists and is rampant but an “uptick” in abuse.

The Verge wrote about journalist Milo Yiannopoulis on July 19, 2016,

Over the past 48 hours in particular, we’ve seen an uptick in the number of accounts violating these policies and have taken enforcement actions against these accounts, ranging from warnings that also require the deletion of Tweets violating our policies to permanent suspension.”

 

Notice the artful phrasing of “uptick.”  That is because Jack and Twitter tacitly condone attacks by SOME empowered abusers on twitter.

Twitter should do the right thing and ban the actual abusers.

Abusers such as @Randileeharper, @Spacekatgal, @glinner & @2dammuslim.

Abusers that target journalists in coordinated attacks and boast about it openly on Twitter.

 

Strangely enough, @2dammuslim has taken to deleting tweets.

Though the archives of the 3 below tweet s exist.  The original twitter URL is presented.

https://twitter.com/2dAmMuslim/status/715279836126818305

https://twitter.com/2dAmMuslim/status/693509673044054021

https://twitter.com/2dAmMuslim/status/724328530650132481

 

https://archive.is/M0Nsh

https://archive.is/knJ5l

https://archive.is/knJ5l

 

The archive of Glinner’s tagging in @2dammuslim to attack journalist @ninjaeconomics contains Mr. Muslim’s response.

Capture

 

 

Here Randi Lee Harper tags in @popehat and @2dammuslim because Mr. Kern (@grummz) is himself a lawyer.

 

And @Jack should actually stop the abusive of professional journalists such as Kristen V Brown and Kassy Dillon.

 

Bit of advice for Vijaya Gadde.  No, it’s not just you.  But you do fuck yourselves, consumers, investors, advertisers and businesses with your openly hostile to consumers policies.

 

I personally never read any tweets by Mr. Yiannopoulis urging his followers to attack anyone.

I read them all the time from people like Brianna Wu (@spacekatgal), Martin Linehan (@glinner), Randi Lee Harper (@randileeharper) and Boner Poopman AKA Mr. Muslim (@2dammuslim.)

Oh yes, the targeted abuse mobs includes close coordination with media such as Jesse Singal, editor for NY Mag.

 

 

Actually Jesse Singal actively participates in the cyberbullying.

 

https://twitter.com/S_Autopsy/status/725096889947922433

Gab Takes Advantage of Lack of @Safety For Women With $TWTR #SocialMedia Alternative. @jack

Having blogged about abuse on Twitter I am saddened to report that a startup is seizing the opportunity to launch in the face of Twitter’s continuing abuse and censorship problem.

Jack Dorsey, the CEO of Twitter has shockingly tweeted that conversations are to hard right now and there are hidden rules.

This is bizarre as Twitter itself is a social media & online communications company.

Of what use is a social media platform that one can’t communicate on?

Virtually none.

 

 

With professional journalists like Kassy Dillon suspended for using the same words Hollywood celebrities use, receiving threat  and Kristen V Brown receiving death threats it remains a wonder any woman feels safe on Twitter.

 

 

 

The alternative, Gab, is to start Beta testing on Monday.

Details will be available on Regated.

 

 

We continue to wish Jack Dorsey and Twitter the best and hope they can salvage what’s left of Twitter’s business and reputation.

 

 

$TWTR Damages Their Investors As #RandiLeeHarper Advocates For ISIS

It is astonishing that @Jack and @Vijaya have allowed 3 people to harm Twitter to the extent that they have.

Lies not only poison the well for twitter and investors, but it destroys what Twitter is at it’s core.  A social media company.  A communications company.

Yet Randi Lee Harper, Zoe Quinn and Brianna Wu erode trust in Twitter daily as they regularly attack twitter consumers.

When Women Action Media teamed up with Twitter to work on the abuse problem, the study concluded that only .66% of harassment claimed by Randi Lee Harper was actually gamergate related.

 

Capture

z2kfbyx2

#Gamergate is a hashtag that twitter allows.  

Yet Twitter allowed 4 women, Randi Lee Harper (@randileeharper), Brianna Wu (@spacekatgal), Zoe Quinn (@unburntwitch)  to label Twitter’s own customers as a “Hate group” equivalent to ISIS for tweeting to a hashtag.

Zoe Quinn is a partner with Randi Lee Harper in Online Abuse Prevention Initiative, allegedly an anti abuse organization.

Frankly it’s a leader in abuse on social media.

 

Although Brianna Wu lists Anita Sarkeesian (@femfreq) as the 4th of their group of women, I find no mention of comparing #gamergate tweets to ISIS in a search of tweets.

 

And yet it is @Randileeharper herself who is “signal boosting” ISIS, as she disseminated instructions on how to create an ISIS botnet, twitter handles of suspected ISIS accounts and various other means of social media usage by ISIS to her followers (and the public as anyone may come across her tweets.)

 

Randi Lee Harper considers tweeting a joke about ISIS as advocating for ISIS…

 

And it is Randi Lee Harper herself who has contacts at Twitter with Safety.

Capture

 

 

Randi Lee Harper brags about taking down WoC journalists openly on twitter.

 

It is shameful journalism, and contributes to the destruction of Twitter itself as @Jack and @Vijaya allow a lie to propagate and disseminate on Twitter.

Why is this person allowed to terrorize Twitter consumers?

 

Randi Lee Harper (a pseudonym, her real name is Olivia Pope) routinely tells consumers to set themselves on fire.

 

And yet this is how Randi Lee Harper treats professional journalists on Twitter.  With utter content, condescension and disdain.

 

 

Randi isn’t hesitatant to talk to reporters.  She only talks to compliant reporters, such as predatorial @jessesingal.

 

So many of the professional tech media simply regurgitate the hateful rehetoric spewed by these 3.

How did the #gamergate hashtag start?

Hollywood actor Adam Baldwin invented it in a tweet.

Randi Lee Harper jumped on it, and started accusing a Hollywood Actor, Adam Baldwin, of being a leader of a hate mob.

And the media ate it up.

Randi Lee Harper has even leaked consumers private information as it relates to moderation of their accounts as @safety has a leak.

Capture

 

 

(Adam has taken to deleting his tweets as protest against Twitter which monetizes him as they allow him to be viciously abused by a predator, Randi Lee Harper.)

 

 

You can see more of Randi Lee Harper’s abuse of Adam, here.

And at no time has Twitter protected their consumers or investors from this insidious attack on their own business interests and customers.

Twitter is utterly corrupt and management and the Board needs to be removed.

They allow Randi Lee Harper to spew lies, abuse and threats.  It’s sick.

 

“Aggressively parroted” by attorneys such as Mitch Jackson, CA litigator of the year in 2013, a highly successful trial lawyer.

 

 

 

Twitter plays favorites and allows these women to abuse their customers.  Openly.

 

 

Jack is a liar, lying about Safety being a priority and about censorship.

Twitter censors for Turkey and other governments, yet went on national televsion and told the world that Twitter does not censor.

We know this is demonstrably false, yet Jack misleads his own investors with falsehoods.

 

Jack Squat

 

gsiKpjs

 

Tweeting ISIS does not break Twitter ToS.

EBy9UYP

 

 

Randi Lee Harper, Founder Of Online Abuse Prevention Initiative Tweets ISIS Propaganda

Online Abuse Prevention Initiative Founder Randi Lee Harper disseminated ISIS propaganda material on Twitter on January 14, 2016.

Randi Lee Harper partners with Alex Lifschitz (Crash Overrride Network), Zoe Quinn (Crash Override Network), and Sheri Rubin (Design Direct Deliver) who serve as inaugural members for the organization’s board of directors at the Online Abuse Prevention Initiative.

Capture

 

 

The series of tweets featured instructions that ISIS uses to create and propagate Bot nets and included a large data dump of ISIS accounts.

Not surprisingly, and as Gilad  Shiloach of Vocativ reports, ISIS has once again mustered a large number of accounts to attack Twitter.

Capture

 

This behavior is beyond bizarre and serves to disseminate and propagate ISIS, not limit it’s impact on Twitter and consumers.

Twitter has friends like these.  Bruce Dasich is a Twitter executive in Europe.

 

Tweets archived.  Not published here in their entirety.

 

 

$TWTR Continues to Fail at #Custserv and Public Relations #socialmedia #socialsales

Over the weekend Twitter removed the @verified account from Jose Canseco.

As is typical, no explantion was given for the removal.

 

However after a quick review of Jose’s timeline, I’m fairly certain why.

 

Never tweet to anyone that their appearance makes you throw up.

We tweeted to Kim Kardashian to inquire, but do not expect a response.

 

What is now known however is that certain people have access to “escalation” channels and can inquire, and/or work to have other people suspended or punished in retributive fashion.

 

It is clear Twitter plays favorites.

This favoritism is very strange as Randi Lee Harper is able to silence LGBT on Twitter and violate consumers privacy.

Twitter continues to exhibit a punitive handling of these issues in certain cases.

Why not reach out to Jose and discuss the reasoning?

Why not provide some level of customer service, especially as their reputation is not so great in social media now?

Why not give Jose an opportunity to correct the problem and have a learning opportunity that can help Jose and make clear to other consumers what is and what is not allowed?

It makes no sense that Twitter leaves not just Jose, but all consumers mystified.

Especially as the double standard of their moderation remains evident.

Some people are pretty freely abused on Twitter.

 

Tweeting the wife of the dude who Twitter is banking on?  Not smart.

 

But this was known when Twitter verified him…

$TWTR @Jack And @Twitter Hate 44 Percent of #Consumers Worldwide, Are Anti #Science

I present Anita Sarkeesian of Feminist Frequency.  AKA @Femfreq.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Unless you are @Jack and @Twitter, and Anita Sarkeesian.

In that case you let a very small subset of consumers label 44% of consumers worldwide as a hate group equivalent to ISIS.

What rational business would allow a small subset to label 44% of available consumers worldwide as a hate group?

Then moderate as if that were the simple truth?

@Jack and @twitter have.

“Gamers” is not listed on the Southern Poverty intelligence report.

Capture

 

1.2 billion people worldwide are gamers.  I am reasonably certain these are people who for the most part aren’t following US politics.

The majority of which are women.

 

Yet if you are a gamer, tweeting to a hashtag on @twitter which Twitter allows, #gamergate, you are labeled as a member of a hate group equivalent to ISIS.

Associating, with a hashtag…

Capture

 

So using twitter as it is designed, means you are a member of a hate group if you tweet to a twitter approved hashtag.

 

Apparently Randi Lee Harper considers it irrefutable that 44% of consumers worldwide belong to a hate group.

 

Yet when Women In Media studies Randi Lee Harper’s data, they found that only .66 percent of people Randi claimed were part of a hate group equivalent to ISIS were online cyberharassers.

z2kfbyx

 

This study was conducted in cooperation with Twitter and subjected to rigorous academic peer review.

Capture

 

Actor Adam Baldwin, whose very livelihood depends on free speech tweeted that he was forced to delete the following tweets.

The screenshots look accurate to me, and although he has since deleted the tweet, I saw the screenshot live on twitter about a month ago.

The orginial link is here.

Backtweets.com has an archive of the tweet, with the corresponding media file link.

Capture

 

That media file graphic is now posted on Imgur and presented here.

 

Apparently a statement about gamergators being attractive and joyous offends Twitter.

Apparently someone at Twitter is anti science.

Capture

 

 

Personally I think allowing a few loud customers to label 44% of consumers worldwide as a member of a hate group is abusive in the extreme.

I have no doubt this active hate of consumers is well known worldwide, and is leading to a massive loss in popularity, growth, and a corresponding lowering of stock price and destruction of investors capital.

 

Yet far from being concerned about this, @Jack and @twitter have placed Anita Sarkeesian on their Orwellian Trust and Safety Council.

Capture

 

@Jack is destroying Twitter as Anita Sarkeesian and Randi Lee Harper ride the wave to fame.

And yet Randi Lee Harper can silence LGBT on Twitter, negatively impacting the psychological health of that marginalized group.

Kinda weird, that.

 

That is my truth to power.

I am not excusing legitimate harassment women receive.

 

 

 

 

Void

The Evil, Hate Filled $TWTR Empire of @Jack and @Randileeharper. #socialmedia #cybersecurity

Randi Lee Harper is the most abusive person I have ever encountered online that simply has been able to remain abusive and unmoderated by Twitter.

I cannot believe @Randileeharper is allowed to have a @twitter account, much less engage in the bullying, harassment and intimidation of twitter customers she flagrantly engages in.

What do journalist Cathy Young, Adult actress Mercedes Carrera, actor Adam Baldwin, Journalist Milo Yiannopoulos, and Game Developer Mark Kern have in common?

Let me rephrase that.  What does a Russian Born Immigrant, a PoC Sex Worker, some white dude, a Gay Jew Greek immigrant, and a Taiwanese immigrant have in common?

Let me rephrase that yet again.

What do people that rely on their free speech for their livelihood have in common?

They are all speaking up for the second amendment.

We are now adding our voice to this struggle.

No one in their right mind is an absolutist about Free Speech.

Having been taught that free speech in the legal sense is free speech minus threats such as don’t yell fire in a crowded movie theatre, don’t make physical threats, this would be clear to anyone of rational mind.

And then we have privileged and empowered Randi Lee Harper.  She is apparently the Darth Vader to Jack and his dark empire.

Randi spends a lot of her time telling people to die in a fire, to light themselves on fire, and other variations thereof.

She also tells people there is no such thing as free speech in social media.

 

She is not a lawyer, and she is wrong.

 

Randi Lee Harper thinks a professional journalist asking her questions on Twitter is “dogpiling.”

 

I’m just going to link tweets for you, of Randi’s.

I contend @Jack is not listening at all.

 

And that his statement herein is a lie.

 

And that this behavior by Twitter is not beneficial for Twitter’s investors.

Capture

 

Remember everyone Randi is talking to is a customer of Twitter, which is open for business.

Anyone she is tweeting might be in any psychological state, a business partner of twitter’s, etc.

This is how Randi Lee Harper is allowed to treat people on Twitter.

She is a ball of empowered hate and bigotry.

All tweets are archived here.

 

Pretty much anyone using social media to talk is accused of sending mobs after Randi if they talk about what Randi does to them.

 

Actually reading content is where it’s at to know what someone is about.

 

44% of consumers online are gamers.  Why is this woman free to abuse 44% of potential twitter customers?

 

 

Self immolation as an act of suicide.  Advocating one self immolate is advocation of violence.

It remains clear to me that despite all of @jack’s words, he hates consumers.

No rational company would allow Randi Lee Harris to attack their own customers in a never ending torrent of hate, vitriol and advocation of violence if they had ANY regard for their “users” as people.

Meanwhile Randi classifies talking as causing a mob.  She’s anti social.  The antithesis of social media, and is destroying $TWTR.

Capture Capture3 Capture4

 

Evil