Tag Archives: gamergate

The Evil, Hate Filled $TWTR Empire of @Jack and @Randileeharper. #socialmedia #cybersecurity

Randi Lee Harper is the most abusive person I have ever encountered online that simply has been able to remain abusive and unmoderated by Twitter.

I cannot believe @Randileeharper is allowed to have a @twitter account, much less engage in the bullying, harassment and intimidation of twitter customers she flagrantly engages in.

What do journalist Cathy Young, Adult actress Mercedes Carrera, actor Adam Baldwin, Journalist Milo Yiannopoulos, and Game Developer Mark Kern have in common?

Let me rephrase that.  What does a Russian Born Immigrant, a PoC Sex Worker, some white dude, a Gay Jew Greek immigrant, and a Taiwanese immigrant have in common?

Let me rephrase that yet again.

What do people that rely on their free speech for their livelihood have in common?

They are all speaking up for the second amendment.

We are now adding our voice to this struggle.

No one in their right mind is an absolutist about Free Speech.

Having been taught that free speech in the legal sense is free speech minus threats such as don’t yell fire in a crowded movie theatre, don’t make physical threats, this would be clear to anyone of rational mind.

And then we have privileged and empowered Randi Lee Harper.  She is apparently the Darth Vader to Jack and his dark empire.

Randi spends a lot of her time telling people to die in a fire, to light themselves on fire, and other variations thereof.

She also tells people there is no such thing as free speech in social media.


She is not a lawyer, and she is wrong.


Randi Lee Harper thinks a professional journalist asking her questions on Twitter is “dogpiling.”


I’m just going to link tweets for you, of Randi’s.

I contend @Jack is not listening at all.


And that his statement herein is a lie.


And that this behavior by Twitter is not beneficial for Twitter’s investors.



Remember everyone Randi is talking to is a customer of Twitter, which is open for business.

Anyone she is tweeting might be in any psychological state, a business partner of twitter’s, etc.

This is how Randi Lee Harper is allowed to treat people on Twitter.

She is a ball of empowered hate and bigotry.

All tweets are archived here.


Pretty much anyone using social media to talk is accused of sending mobs after Randi if they talk about what Randi does to them.


Actually reading content is where it’s at to know what someone is about.


44% of consumers online are gamers.  Why is this woman free to abuse 44% of potential twitter customers?



Self immolation as an act of suicide.  Advocating one self immolate is advocation of violence.

It remains clear to me that despite all of @jack’s words, he hates consumers.

No rational company would allow Randi Lee Harris to attack their own customers in a never ending torrent of hate, vitriol and advocation of violence if they had ANY regard for their “users” as people.

Meanwhile Randi classifies talking as causing a mob.  She’s anti social.  The antithesis of social media, and is destroying $TWTR.

Capture Capture3 Capture4





Is Empowered By @Jack Cyberbully #Randileeharper A Legitimate Threat To LGBT $TWTR #Consumers? #cybersecurity

I am appalled that Randi Lee Harper has met with @Twitter @safety in early 2015.


Randi Lee Harper, who founded an anti abuse charity, is one of the most open advocates of violence on Twitter.

According to her own definition, she is a Digital Terrorist as she has a history of doxing consumers on twitter, thereby removing their digital privacy by exposing personal data online which is a crime in CA.



According to Twitter in  various public statements, Twitter stands for freedom of expression.


According to Twitter General Council Vijaya Gadde in a Washington Post Op-Ed dated 4/16/2015,

I’m often inspired by the vigorous debates on controversial issues that occur on Twitter, but I’ve also been seriously troubled by the plight of some of our users who are completely overwhelmed by those who are trying to silence healthy discourse in the name of free expression.


And yet this is precisely what Randi Lee Harper does, silences healthy discourse through a combination of lies, intimidation, threats and overt McCarthyism.

This has left one of the most marginalized audiences on Twitter both afraid of her, and afraid to engage in discourse with those that seek to help them.

That would be the LGBT community.

How does she do so?  By repeated false and misleading tweets about there being no Freedom of Speech in social media.

This is in direct contradiction of Federal, state and local CA law.  CA is the state Twitter is headquartered in, and I personally am a resident of CA.

Attorney Mitch Jackson has answered the question of Free Speech on twitter before.

Mitch was CA 2013 attorney of the year, and is widely recognized for his legal expertise.


Randi Lee Harper has spent a lot of time both segregating her audience from the general twitter population and reinforcing that they have no rights beyond what Twitter ToS says.


So after lying to a marginalized community for over a year (and Twitter allegedly prohibits false and misleading tweets) the LGBT community which are her followers are cowed, fearful and unable to take part in rational social media discourse.



I am not part of gamer gate and not blocked by her blockbots.



In her own words, Randi does not care about the silencing of #lgbt advocates.


I can imagine why she would be concerned, she would be unable to exploit her abused audience for funding.


Except that the State of CA does have anti harassment law on the books.  It’s just that Twitter doesn’t really concern themselves with law all that much that I can tell.

As does the Federal government.

Randi Lee Harper is a one person Hostile Environment Zone.

The audience made up of consumers recognize hypocrisy when they see it.


Twitter however does not.


Building walled off fortresses to sit in and rule others is Randi Lee Harper’s expertise.  

Not social media networking, not digital communications, not risk management, not social media, not public policy, not branding, not anything.

She abuses and make money off those she abuses.


Why do I belive that Randi may be a legitimate credible threat of violence to others?

When Randi Lee Harper’s claims of “harassment” were fact checked by WomenInMedia.org only the results were clear that Randi Lee Harper, and anyone labeling GamerGate an organized hate group (it’s a twitter hashtag) was lying about the extent of harassment.



Her transiition to SJW was quite sudden.


She expresses a desire for martyrdom.


Built her army (cult of personality.)


And soon started her campaign of hatred, establishing her pattern of fear and intimidation.



She soon began exhibiting signs of apparent paranoia in public.


However she noted she thought they were to intimidated to approach.


She seems to think her ability to get away with harassing people is hilarious.


Randi knows that blocking people creates a safety hazard.


Yet the censorship of other people on @twitter wasn’t a problem until it affected her safety, personally.


She struggles with public life.


Complains about being dehumanized even as she conflated .66% of harassment into a HATE GROUP.


She builds up anger.


And expects everyone else to put up with her abusive ways.


Randi released a blacklist, which may have caused people to lose their homes.


And relies on donations for her ADD meds.


I am amazed at how far she has gotten as she openly terrorizes twitter consumers, including silenced #lgbt.


I have ZERO idea how @jack can tell the general public that safety and privacy are a priority.

None, zero, nada, zilch.




I do not want to run into her on the street.

The amazing thing is you can report this to @support, and it does not violate @twitter policy.







Related Content:






Alleged Anti Abuse Advocate Silencing #LGBTQ, POC And Destroying $TWTR #socialmedia #cybersecurity

When @jack tweets that Twitter is for Freedom of Expression and for empowering dialogue I do not believe him.

I do not believe any journalist, investor or consumer should believe him.


Independent Developer Randi Lee Harper is able to both cyberbully Twitter consumers and impact Twitter @safety policy while violating the privacy of twitter consumers due to an apparent insider leak at @twitter safety.


We believe this is due to her self stated privilege.



She is empowered to the point that protecting your account, a @twitter @safety feature cannot protect you from Randi Lee Harper.


Randi has a history of doxing people on Twitter, and has threatened to pull down metadata on anyone posting anything she does not like.



It is impossible to know what it is she might not like, as she herself noted that what is cyber harassment is entirely subjective.



Newsweek has written an article entitled, How Cyber Mobs And Trolls Have Ruined The Internet and Destroyed Lives.


Randi Lee Harper is a leader of a mob, a vicious troll, and has attempted to destroy lives openly, on Twitter and remains unmoderated by Twitter @support.

Randi is very proud of being famous for blocking people.

She then uses her coding ability so her mob of followers can block individuals, destroying their ability to communicate with their friends, followers and audience that only intended to use Twitter for it’s stated purpose.

This leaves consumers, who only wished to communicate with friends and engage in speech in the position of having to beg @randileeharper to unblock them.

Her blocking algorithm, which filters content she herself holds to be low quality, is technically against Twitter’s own Developer Agreement & Policy.

She blatantly filters content.

Randi Lee Harper, with no medical degree, believes she can diagnose the cause of PTSD, then acts to stop valid discussion because she is privileged and not stopped by @jack.

She exhibited this over a series of tweets ending with the censoring of the hashtag, #thetriggering.


The difference between Google and GMail and Randi Lee Harper is that Google is the host of the content and they can set the rules as they wish, including which hashtags can appear and trend on Twitter.

This ostracization, blacklisting, is McCarthyist in nature and directly contradicts what Twitter is for when it is done with intent to silence legitimate critique, commentary and news.

In fact, Randi doesn’t read the content, she simply judges the metadata and if you tweet to something she doesn’t personally like, you are subject to being labeled a hater, or whatever term she chooses to abuse you with.


It leads to the political polarization of Twitter, which has been noted by researchers as a problem with Twitter. 

This problem can only be by intent, as Randi Lee Harper engages in this activity and has influence at @twitter.

Randi Lee Harper believes free speech is a failed ethos.



The Twitter rules prohibit creating false and misleading tweets, however this is seldom enforced, and certainly not enforced against Randi Lee Harper, who serially lies  to twitter consumers to hide her confessed motives.


Randi Lee Harper, is by twitter’s own definition, spam.




Randi has had meeting with @safety in early 2015.


Who is Randi Lee Harper?

Randi Lee Harper is a self declared SJ advocate (Social Justice Warrior, on the left of the political spectrum) and runs an anti abuse charity, Online Abuse Prevention Initiative, which apparently is a registered charitable foundation.


Randi is crowdfunded, and has a Patreon seeking donation.




Randi wishes for her politics to be part of the code, and advocates for that.


However, the effect of that @policy leading to potential #cybersecurity and @safety concerns was unknown by Randi Lee Harper until she herself was affected.

Up until that point, people being disconnected from their audiences was not a problem for her.  Indeed she found it laughable.


It always is, and was a valid @safety concern, however Randi, allegedly a @policy expert, had no idea of this.  I believe she has no Risk Management experience or knowledge.

Why she can impact @twitter @safety @policy is the great unknown question, to me.

Randi herself knows that SJ Twitter is the worst side of twitter, and utilizes her ability to livestream content she herself does not approve of so her mob can activate and harass people posting on Twitter.

Then people are subjected to lies and harassment by people such as @sschinke who seemingly exist to harass people with opposing viewpoints.


Randi herself wishes to burn it all down.


What is privilege?


Something Randi Lee Harper abuses to silence others online.

And yet journalists, like @kristenvbrown,  leap to blog about Randi’s false charges without checking the veracity of their source.


So while white feminists like Randi Lee Harper crush diversity by silencing Women of Color at open to the public events like SXSW, where they have been invited to speak, journalists slavishly pound away, to attack the targets highlighted by Randi Lee Harper, who tweets falsehoods.

Perhaps Women of Color should worry about ALL white women named Randi Lee Harper, not just those that champion diversity as part of their Social Justice platform, until they need someone silenced?


Randi even has no problem violating consumers privacy AT SXSW, peering over shoulders to read phones.


Although I am confused, I thought diversity was the foundation of social justice?

Those Randi has often targeted openly have a common denominator.  They are people of color.

Randi Lee Harper wants to feed her son to Mexicans and build fences.

That sounds familiar, where have I heard THAT before?


Randi Lee Harper has no idea that the problem with privilege is in the way she uses it.

You see a privilege, also mentioned in the Constitution, is held by the people, but it cannot be exerted, it can only be given by others.  And polite people need not accept, nor abuse their platform.

Randi Lee Harper remains one of the most openly abusive people I have encountered on the internet,

That she runs a charity dedicating to fighting online abuse, is amazing.

In Randi’s particular case equating anti harassment with curtailing free speech is entirely correct.


Randi was able to have Mercedes Carrera deplatformed at SXSW, a Tech festival in Texas apparently run by racists such as Hugh W Forrest and Kelli Jo Krause

@SXSW also asked Mercedes to delete tweets after she had flown to Austin from Los Angeles and landed.

Certainly this abusive behavior should not be readily accepted by a society concerned with open expression.


I remain shocked @jack and @twitter allow her to destroy the stated purpose of @twitter as she attacks their consumers openly.

And no, not all that she does benefits everyone.  She abuses her privilege to attack and silence People of Color.


This is why Randi Lee Harper vehemently defends CDA 230.

@twitter has immunity from lawsuits as a common carrier.  They can leak her information that breaks their own customers privacy and be relatively (not absolutely) immune from lawsuit.


However Professional tech writers like @Shanley, owner of @modelviewculture, are starting to see through the abuse that @randileeharper piles on POC, and write critical pieces.

We hope this continues, as Twitter cannot or will not moderate Randi.


They allow this “Literal Hitler” to magnify a small percentage of actual harassment into the abject demonization and hatred of their own consumers who post to a hashtag Twitter allows to be on their network.



Credit:  To the wonderful people that archived Randi Lee Harper’s Tweets So This Blog Could Be Written.

It is only through the efforts of all concerned citizens that cyberbullying and cyberharassment can be ended.

Obviously Twitter does not apply their Terms of Service to Randi Lee Harper.

She is allowed to propagate hate quite openly.




Randi Lee Harper


Maybe people shouldn’t take legal advice from @randileeharper?


I prefer expert lawyers in the state of California, where Twitter does business.


Related Content: