Flow charts of who talks to who, who was seen by whom and little is said about what was said at those meetings. Or public events. Or if the nature of the “discussion” was an attempt to understand another or just pure propaganda.
Imagine for a moment that the algorithms and API’s that provide the data “big data” scienists use to evaluate networks is itself biased.
Does that sound impossible?
A woman that silenced LGBT with her bots meets with tech companies to influence their policies.
That same woman begged for “feminism” in the code.
Do you think a woman who became a renowned public speaker had any influence at Google and Youtube over how their algorithm was coded?
Brianna Wu has spent years asking Google to put “trusted sources” into the code.
If we are considering “trustworthiness” isn’t it important that Randi Lee Harper, who worked with Brianna Wu, silenced LGBT with her bots on Twitter?
Who is zooming who here?
Who elected Brianna Wu and Randi Lee Harper Chiefs of Social Ostracization™?
I want a revote.
Tim Pool, who did excellent reporting on the water shortage (crisis) in East Porterville,CA …
…and who is a self employed journalist (multi racial) and non high school graduate finds himself lumped in with some actually awful people.
How do you deal with data scientists that not only rely on biased algorithms and API data but falsify facts?
How to measure the harm to a self employed journalist who the Left appears to be trying to silence? Tim Pool relies on Youtube monetization for his living.
Congress needs to heavily regulate these monoliths. And investigate them for Antitrust violations. CDA 230 needs to be repealed and social media held accountable for the falsehoods their ‘data” enables and their platforms spread by accounts they allow to exist.
In short, social media companies need to have the same risks and responsibilities everyone else int he United States. They have abused their privilege of immunity and have abused others Civil Rights in doing so.
Si Se Puede!