What Could Possibly Fuel The Continuing Abuse of #Twitter Customers?

Why would a known false advertiser think he’s a reputable primary source for anything?

Keith Gill, AKA Digitalkeith, a man so abusive on Twitter that the SF DA’s office and CA DOJ investigated Twitter’s handling remains able to bully and harass people on Twitter.

Keith Gill is currently a corporate marketing manager for @avisolve.

His activiities, along with other “goon squad” of Empire Avenue people helped change Twitter’s abuse policy according to Ethel Newlin of the San Francisco District Attorney’s office.




Keith Gill, who instead of simply fixing his artlcle on Sales 4 Life began engaging in trolling and cyberbullying remains unable to accept the truth of what he is.

Sadly, he continues to troll and abuse others who are simply warning others of his abusive ways.

When will Twitter stand up for a clean, honest and forthright marketplace on Twitter, and protect their consumers from such abusive people as Keith Gill?

Does Twitter actually intend to protect consumers, or are people just freely abused?

Of course allowing abusive people such as Keith Gill on Twitter simply drives away core users, which TWITTER already knows.

According to The Verge, quoting former CEO Dick Costolo,

Twitter CEO Dick Costolo is taking personal responsibility for his platform’s chronic problems with harassment and abuse, telling employees that he is embarrassed for the company’s failures and would soon be taking stronger action to eliminate trolls. He said problems with trolls are driving away the company’s users. “We suck at dealing with abuse and trolls on the platform and we’ve sucked at it for years,” Costolo wrote in an internal memo obtained by The Verge. “It’s no secret and the rest of the world talks about it every day. We lose core user after core user by not addressing simple trolling issues that they face every day.”


Why doesn’t Keith Gill simply fix his own house and stop abusing Twitter’s customers?

According to Vijaya Gadde, General Council of Twitter,

This is, to put it mildly, not good enough. Freedom of expression means little as our underlying philosophy if we continue to allow voices to be silenced because they are afraid to speak up. We need to do a better job combating abuse without chilling or silencing speech.




Does Twitter stand against abuse or not?

Simply because Keith Gill doesn’t seem to accept the validity of consumer affairs blogging shouldn’t leave a person free to abuse everyone else engaging in free speech.


Related Content:





Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s